Best Walking Shoes of 2025 | Field Tested and Reviewed
We'll often think about the weight on our back but not on our feet, and some quality walking shoes can really make a difference in the right circumstances
Walking shoes are an ideal choice for hiking when you want to feel lighter, more agile and cooler on the trail. There’s also the energy-saving side of things; the weight of a pair of walking shoes is usually around 750g whereas walking boots tend to be around 1200g and that difference in weight can make a real difference over long distances.
Before we get into the nitty gritty and show you our pick of the best hiking shoes, we should highlight the fact that there are different types designed for different activities and in this article we’re not only going to break these down but we’ll show your our favourite picks from each category.
Our team out in Scotland and Wales putting the shoes through their paces.
Best Walking Shoes: Our Team’s Top Picks
In this selection, we’ve included a range of different style of trail shoes. You’ll see straight-up walking shoes – essentially walking boots without the ankle – and you’ll also see trail running shoes that will also be suitable for hiking. Then there’s another category which sits in between the two and that’s the ‘fast hiking’ category and these are best described as a walking shoe-trail running shoe hybrid. Finally, there are also approach shoes – the AKU Rock DFS being a good example there. If that’s the kind of shoe you’re here for, we’ve got a guide to the best approach shoes that will help you there.
I’m Will, I’m the editor of this site and for the past six years I’ve not only had my finger right on the pulse of the latest outdoor gear news on a daily basis, but I’ve also spent a lot of time out testing products, whether that’s specifically for work or as part of my hobby. I do a lot of long distance hiking and am proud to say I’m a trustee for the Cambrian Way hiking trail and a former president of the Ramblers in Wales. I’ve also been on the awards juries for the likes of ISPO, the Outdoor Industries Association and the Scandinavian Outdoor Award. Emma Cole also helped me with this selection process. Emma is a journalist that specialises in hiking and backpacking – hobbies that have taken her to far-flung places around the world.
The Selection Process
Our testing for this round was mainly conducted during our Outdoor 100 and Green Gear Guide test trips to places like Snowdonia, the Scottish Highlands and even further afield. At the very least, we spent a couple of days in the shoes and at the most, we hiked hundreds of miles on long-distance trails. What makes a good pair of hiking shoes? For us, durability up top and comfort and reliability underfoot are the most important aspects. We also like a pair of shoes that block out roots and rocks underfoot, though without reducing the overall ‘feel’ for the trail.
Rating System
In our cushioning ratings, 1 represents a hard shoe while 10 represents a very soft one. With the stiffness levels, 1 represents a very flexible shoe and 10 represents a very stiff one.
1. Keen 450 Dirt
Best waterproof walking shoe: This gets our pick as the the best hiking shoe in our tests that has full waterproof protection.
OM editor Will Renwick using the 450 Dirt in Glencoe, Scotland. Photo: Dave Macfarlane
Price: £145 Weight: 409g Best for: long distance walking What we liked: ergonomic design, innovative What we didn’t like: lacing system a little too simple
This is a unique shoe that features a lightweight plate and midsole that’s slightly bow-shaped – Keen have basically copied the geometry of those new carbon-plated running shoes that are all the rage at the moment. The result is a shoe that feels instantly different when you pull it on, and one that, in fact, takes a bit of getting used to. Once you are used to it though, it does genuinely feel like it makes walking easier, with the sole creating a feeling of gentle propulsion and a natural forward roll. We got the sense that over the course of a long day, it might actually contribute to some energy savings – though that’s hard to scientifically measure, of course. It’s one of the reasons why we’ve selected this as the best shoe for long distance walking.
Fortunately, it gets the other aspects right too. We found that the outsole brought a trail running shoe-like grip to the table and it chomped nicely into soft ground and dusty trails. It felt comfortable to wear too, but we did find ourselves wishing that the lacing extended a bit further towards the toes to give a bit more control over the fit.
We tested out the waterproof version but there’s also a non-waterproof one that will suit those who’re looking for something for hikes in warm and dry conditions.
Available in men’s and women’s versions / Waterproofing?: Keen.Dry / Outsole: Keen.All-Terrain / Cushioning rating: 8/10 / Stiffness level: 6/10
A close second: This was our previous top pick and it still ranks highly for us
Our tester Emma using The North Face Vectiv Fastpack in the hills of Wales.
Price: £78 Weight: 323g Best for: trail hiking, general wear What we liked: rocker geometry at the sole creates forward propulsion What we didn’t like: it’d be good to see more recycled content used
We found that these waterproof walking trainers from The North Face tick all the right boxes for us and they passed our tests with flying colours.
The outsole had good grip on muddy surfaces and performance across slightly wet boulder fields too. The North Face’s proprietary membrane, called Futurelight, did what we wanted it to do in wet weather and the sole unit had a nice bit of flex while still being very good at blocking out sharp rocks and roots.
It also features The North Face’s clever Vectiv technology which involves a lightweight and flexible 3D printed plate that’s embedded within the midsole. Combined with a rocker geometry at the sole, this creates a touch of forward propulsion and a natural rolling feel. From our experience with this, we found it does create a smooth and quite natural feel, saving you from jarring heel shocks while also potentially creating energy savings too.
“The fit is comfortable and supportive, all thanks to the spongy foam cushioning, moulded spandex collar and the stable heel positioning,” said our tester Emma. “I also liked the fact it has a double-punched lacing system which means the fit can be fine-tuned to ensure maximum stability when moving over varied ground.”
Available in men’s and women’s versions / Waterproofing?: Futurelight / Outsole: Surface Control / Cushioning rating: 7/10 / Stiffness level: 6/10
Most comfortable hiking shoe: This wins our award for being the most comfortable over hard terrain and over long distances.
Price: £180 Weight: 680g Best for: long-distance hiking, lightweight backpacking What we liked: very comfortable, lightweight What we didn’t like: price
Lightweight, comfortable and pretty darn cool looking in our opinion, we’re big fans of these trail shoes by U.S-based brand Danner. So much so that one of our tester Will Renwick wore the pair they had daily for four years until the sole eventually wore out.
“These are potentially the most comfortable pair of hiking shoes I’ve worn,” said Will. “They’re plush under the heel and they offer all-round performance. The fit was absolutely spot on too – they became my day-to-day pair of shoes for everything from hiking on trails to wearing about town.”
Named in reference to the 2650 miles of the Pacific Crest Trail, these are designed with long distance walkers specifically in mind with loads of padding underfoot thanks to the three layers of varying density in the sole, including EVA foam and a removable ortholite insole.
There’s also good support at the back of the heel thanks to what Danner call their EXO Heel System. This serves to pocket your heel and prevents it sliding about. We found this to be very comfortable and the shoe felt very ergonomic overall.
Other things we liked include the quality suede leather and the Vibram outsole with multi-directional lugs for a bit of grip on dusty or muddy trails.
Available in men’s and women’s versions / Waterproofing?: Gore-tex (non-waterproof also available / Outsole: Vibram Megagrip / Cushioning rating: 8.5/10 / Stiffness level: 5/10
Best for rocky trails: The stiff plate and overall durability to this shoe gains it our pick as the best shoe for rocky trails.
The Alp Trainers during our team’s recent trip to the Highlands. Photo: Michael Drummond
Price: £185 Weight: 370g (women’s) Best for: hiking and trekking What we liked: durable construction, quality materials, comfortable build What we didn’t like: the toe is quite narrow
Light but protective and supportive, grippy over a variety of terrain and comfortable over long distances too, whether it’s a morning of scrambling or a whole day on a trail, our female tester reported that the Alp Trainer 2 is right at home in whatever situation.
The Alp Trainer 2 comes armed with all the features you’d expect from a walking shoe, such as a grippy and robust Vibram outsole and waterproofing courtesy of a Gore-tex liner. At 964g per pair, they’re lighter than much of the competition, making them a solid choice for adventurous peak baggers, scramblers, hut-to-hut hikers and long-distance trekkers.
The women’s version of this is made with a women’s specific last designed to properly cater for female feet. A men’s fit is also available and there’s a mid cut variation for those who prefer a higher ankle.
These got our pick as the best lightweight walking shoes in our tests.
Price: £160 Weight: 235g (per shoe) Best for: Approach, fell running What we liked: lightweight, grippy What we didn’t like: toe is quite narrow, light on protection
Like the Keen shoes in this review, the sole unit on these trail shoes from Arc’teryx has a rocker geometry to it and this creates a nice forward roll to these that we found supported a more natural stride. In the long term, many hold that this type of sole actually reduces the likelihood of injuries.
It might be designed primarily for running, but we found the Sylan to have everything we want from a hiking shoe. There’s a Gore-tex membrane for waterproof protection, a reasonably aggressive outsole for grip and a rockplate that blocks out sharp rocks and roots.
This could’ve been a contender for our Best Buy Walking Shoe. Instead we’ve decided to designate it as the best lightweight walking shoe out of our tests.
“I’ve been really impressed by this,” said tester, Will Renwick. “That rocker geometry does create a nice smooth roll that’s particularly noticeable on flat and hard surfaces. It’s grippy and pretty durable up top too. I’ve put in a lot of miles in my pair and they’re holding up very well.”
Best barefoot style walking shoe: The Vivobarefoot Primus Trailknit is the best zero drop shoe from our tests.
Will wearing the Tracker Decon which is now replaced by the Primus Trailknit
Price: £140 Weight: 350g Best for: light, dry trails What we liked: very breathable, good grip What we didn’t like: barefoot style isn’t got everyone
The Primus Trailknit from British brand Vivobarefoot is part of a wider genre of footwear known as ‘barefoot’ shoes. It’s a type of footwear designed to encourage a more natural and intuitive style of walking, in turn producing less impact on your muscles and joints. While not for everyone, if you’re the type of person that’s fed up with ultra cushioned footwear and want to find something with a bit more ‘feel’ for the trail, this is a pair worth considering
As is typical of barefoot shoes, we found these to be very roomy around the toes but they still felt secure around the heel and midfoot. They also provided a nice bit of bite on steep, typically slippery surfaces. The stretchy upper was comfortable and breathable and gave the shoe a slipper-like feel. A good shoe for the category. If you want waterproof protection, cushioning, support and rigidity, it’s best to look elsewhere.
“It’s really striking how much wiggle room these give your toes,” said our tester Will. “They’re pretty thin up top and underfoot – and that minimalism did take some getting used to.”
Will with the Kiprun MT3, a non-waterproof shoe for warm weather hiking.
Price: £90 Weight: 323g Best for: warm weather trail hikes What we liked: good value, grippy on a range of surfaces, fast feeling, breathable upper, drains well What we didn’t like: grip is limited on wet rock, won’t suit those who like a lot of cushioning
These aren’t waterproof and they’re actually specifically designed for trail running, but we’ve found them to be a very nifty pair of shoes for walking in. They have a very stable platform, a protective midsole and a grippy outsole that we found to have impressive versatility. We hiked in them on muddy trails, gravel tracks and on wet grassy slopes and they gripped well and they were good at shedding mud on all but wet, chalky tracks. We also liked how light the MT3 felt; it feels nimble but without being flimsy or non protective. There’s also plenty of protection from sharp rocks and roots underfoot. While there’s a touch of shock absorption, we did find it could do with a little more cushioning.
Overall, we’d say this is a good choice for anyone who wants a good value and breathable shoe for warm weather – and one they can hike and run in.
Available in men’s and women’s versions / Waterproofing?: None / Outsole: proprietary / Cushioning rating: 5/10 / Stiffness level: 6/10
OM editor Will using the Aku Link GTX on the Welsh coast.
Price: £155 Weight: 460g Best for: trail hikes on rocky terrain What we liked: quality craftsmanship, grippy sole What we didn’t like: quite solid underfoot
This, as we’ve come to expect from Aku, is a very well crafted shoe that uses impressive materials, including suede leather, a Gore-tex membrane and a Vibram sole. It might look like an approach shoe, but we found it felt and performed more like a walking shoe, offering some flex at the sole and a bit more of a relaxed fit at the toes. At 460g per shoe it’s also a touch lighter than most approach shoes.
Interestingly, the Gore-tex membrane wraps over the tongue within a stretchy mesh and the lacing links within this at the very top. This keeps out moisture but also small bits of dirt and debris too. Normally the membrane goes through the tongue instead of over it, so this design is a little unusual, but the feeling and performance doesn’t seem to be any different. If you like a highly cushioned sole then we’d advise looking elsewhere as, while there is shock absorption here, it’s on the light side.
“Solid but with a bit of flex – that’s how I’d describe the sole,” said our tester, Will. “In my eyes, it makes these shoes perfect for rocky and very uneven trails and the build and material quality is excellent.”
Selected for our Outdoor 100 gear of the year guide. Read our full Aku Link GTX review.
Available in men’s and women’s versions / Waterproofing?: Gore-tex / Outsole: Vibram Pepe / Cushioning rating: 6/10/ Stiffness level: 8.5/10
Editor Will wearing the Adidas Terrex Free Hiker Low 2.0 on the trail.
Price: £119 Weight: 382g Best for: fast hiking What we liked: Lightweight, well-cushioned What we didn’t like: not very durable
The Free Hiker has been an extremely popular shoe from Adidas over the last couple of years. This is the second iteration of it and we’d say it’s definitely been improved, certainly in terms of its durability anyway.
It features the brand’s trademark running technology which is called Boost. Boost is essentially a foam-based midsole that offers large amounts of cushioning with quite a springy feeling whilst you’re walking. It makes for an impressive amount of comfort on the trails that you’ll be thankful of after a few miles in your legs.
Also underfoot, you’ve got a Continental rubber outsole with 5mm lugs that wouldn’t look out of place on a trail running shoe. It’s these lugs that give some great traction over the trails.
We tested the non waterproof version and found it great for hot weather hiking. There is a version with a Gore-tex membrane.
“The previous edition of this shoe was a little flimsy,” said our tester Will, “so it’s good to see they’ve toughened it up now. I’m glad they haven’t changed the cushioning in the sole though. It still has that plushness that makes this hiking shoe really stand out.”
Available in men’s and women’s versions / Waterproofing?: Gore-tex (non-waterproof version also available / Outsole: Continental / Cushioning rating: 8.5/10 / Stiffness level: 3/10
OM editor Will using the Aku Rock DFS on a scramble in north Wales
Price: £145 Weight: 760g Best for: trail hiking, approach hiking, scrambling What we liked: innovative design, good quality materials, comfortable sock-like fit What we didn’t like: quite heavy
We selected this as our best overall walking shoe due to the versatility we found it presented. It’s the kind of thing made for anything from long-distance trail hikes, hut-to-hut treks and even some graded scrambling too. We felt that the craftsmanship here was excellent. It feels like a shoe that’s made to last.
And it’s unique too. It features a double lacing system that, according to the Italian brand, “allows you to adjust the comfort and precision of the fit in the different phases of use: a traditional lace for maximum comfort while walking and a fast lacing to increase sensitivity in the climbing phase.” This essentially means that you’ve got a walking shoe and an approach shoe all-in-one.
Gimmick or game-changer? We’d say the latter. We found that the lacing system really is convenient and effective. On a hike up to Ben Nevis we found ourselves making subtle tweaks as we went to adapt to the different types of terrain we encountered and this aided both the performance and the comfort.
“I found it was nice and solid underfoot, so no sharp rocks or roots niggled,” said tester, Will Renwick, “but it still had the level of flexibility you’d want for a shoe to cover high mileage in.”
One other feature worthy of mention is the tongue. This has the same supportive ‘sock-like’ fit as many of AKU’s boots, like the Aku Tengu range for example. It creates a close-fitting and comfortable upper without any of the creases or folds that can sometimes cause rubbing and hotspots.
Looking to buy a new pair of shoes and don’t know where to start? We’ve got all you need to know, including the pros and cons of walking shoes over walking boots, the differences between the different categories of hiking shoes and an guide to cleaning your footwear to make it last longer.
Walking Boots Versus Walking Shoes
Look back at pictures of Appalachian Trail hikers from decades passed and you’ll see people with big leather boots that come right up the ankle. These days, however, the typical AT hiker will tend to be seen in a pair of lightweight trail shoes – more often than not, a pair of Altra or Hokas. Preferences change and long-distance hikers no longer see stability and durability as the be-all-and-end-all and instead are prioritising agility and fleet footedness.
Hiking boots still have their advantages over hiking shoes in certain situations – particularly when there’s a lot of rocky ascent – but they’re no longer seen as the only option for hiking in now. It’s a horses for courses situation, however. There are certainly many instances where a hiking boot might be more beneficial over a walking shoe. When it’s boggy, for instance, you might want something with a high ankle to prevent overflow. Or if the terrain is very uneven and rocky, a high ankle can reduce the risk of injury.
We found a research piece by Northern Michigan University to be useful when researching for this round up. Looking at the physiological impact comparison between hiking boots and hiking shoes, it found that hiking boots do help, very marginally, to lessen the impact on joints and wearing hiking shoes on ascents can also increase oxygen uptake as well.
Opting for hiking boots over rough and rocky terrain can reduce the risk of injury.
The Features of Walking Shoes
Walking shoes, which come in a few different forms which we’ll detail further down, will be cut low down at the ankle, below a mid cut. Sometimes they’ll have a waterproof membrane but in many cases they won’t. Walking shoes are generally lighter and therefore less energy sapping than hiking boots over long distances. They can also be cooler in warmer temperatures. They also tend to cost less than walking boots too.
Look for shoes that have big lugs on the outsole that will grip into muddy surfaces. It’s also worth assessing the rubber compound that’s featured. Vibram, Continental and Michelin are reliable compound manufacturers, but many brands make their own proprietary compounds that have good performance too. When possible, it’s worth feeling the sole on a pair of shoes before you buy them. If it feels soft and sticky, that tends to mean it’ll grip well on hard surfaces. If it feels hard and smooth, that means it’ll perform well on soft surfaces like mud or sand.
If you’re hiking on rocky trails you might want to look for a shoe with a stiff rock plate in the midsole. This will prevent roots and rocks from causing discomfort underfoot and they’ll also create stability when you’re ascending. The shank or ‘rock plate’ comes into play here. This is a stiff layer within the midsole that’s designed to protect your feet while also adding stiffness and propulsion to the sole unit.
Our team testing a pair of Helly Hansen shoes.
Do Hiking Shoes Need to be Waterproof?
Whether you should opt for waterproofing or not depends on the conditions. If you’re hiking out in warm and dry conditions then non-waterproof shoes will ensure maximum breathability. Conversely, if you’re mainly going to be out in wet or snowy conditions then waterproofing will help.
That’s putting things simply. To get more complex, there are some hikers who’ll opt for non-waterproof shoes even in wet weather. If there’s a chance you could end up being out in wet conditions where water is likely to get over the top of your shoes and inside them, some would argue that it’s better to have shoes that will at least let the water out. Many long distance hikers – particularly Pacific Crest Trail or Appalachian Trail hikers – who can expect all kinds of conditions over the course of their journey – will opt for non-waterproof shoes as, on balance, they’ll be the most versatile across the varied climatic conditions.
Our tester using the Salewa Alp Trainer on rocky trails in Glen Nevis, Scotland.
Ultimately, the best approach here depends on the types of hikes and conditions you’ll mainly be experiencing. If you’ll more than likely be mostly on defined trails and hiking in mild to cold conditions, then waterproof shoes will be ideal, but if you’ll be out in a lot of hot stuff, unlined shoes are for you. Or, if you’re doing a lot of varied hiking in all kinds of conditions – and you definitely want a shoe over a boot – perhaps an unlined trail shoe is for you.
How to Clean and Reproof a Pair of Walking Shoes
Here’s a guide that we put together that explains how to clean a pair of walking shoes or boots. We cover from top to bottom here; from cleaning off debris through to fully reproofing footwear. If you want your footwear to perform for you, and to last, this is essential viewing.
Please enter your email so we can keep you updated with news, features and the latest offers. If you are not interested you can unsubscribe at any time. We will never sell your data and you'll only get messages from us and our partners whose products and services we think you'll enjoy.
